As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. und es beim Kippen darum geht, die chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert. JavaScript is disabled. "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. HP5 Plus. Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. Id guess the image on the right is Fomapan and vice versa. leider habe ich beim K400 aber in der standentwicklung nie die Wlkchen in den Griff gekriegt- die Entwicklung wurde immer fleckig und ungleichmig, weil ja die Bewegung fehlte. Ive shot numerous rolls of this film to test repairs Ive made to my cameras, but not very many on what Id consider serious work. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich mich fr den Silvermax entschieden. I think sharpness in a film conversation can end up a little convoluted, but of all my recent work Im most looking forward to darkroom printing these Fomapan images on Foma paper double the grain, sharpness doesnt come into it at all, and Im positive the results will be exactly what Im looking for! Some people love them; others cant stand them. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. den APX400 kann ich uneingeschrnkt empfehlen. And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. Processed in Legacy Pro L-110 (HC110 knock off) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. Although these werent excessively Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. Theres any number of things I could try. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain, especially in the skies. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. But for some, $20 is a big deal. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. I think again the Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the highlights. If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? I then used Lightroom for final adjustments and export. You must log in or register to reply here. I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. You are using an out of date browser. My negatives always look really dull. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. What a difference! totally agree with the article. Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. 1. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend. Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. It is a true 400 ISO film. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. So which is the better film? Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. ? Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better understanding of its place in my workflow. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. I get where you are coming from. Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. However I really wanted to get better negatives. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. I bought some and tried it and it worked. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. Simon, nice job! Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. Thank you! Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Clear editor. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. Display as a link instead, I'm open to any dispute. APX is the opposite and pushes very well. Is that the new Jane Bond? for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. Learn how your comment data is processed. schrfe war nie ein Problem. Everything is personal preference, just And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. Tags: Black and White NegativeFomaMedium FormatReview. Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. I highly recommend you check it out here. Was in D76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Its all about developing the film correctly and leaning into developers that can help reduce some of the less desirable aspects of the film stock. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. Thanks again for another informative article. for roll of Kentmere 400. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? I think that these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities. Noticeable halation. After acquiring a Minolta 16 spy camera, and a Goerz Minicord TLR, Ive had need for 16mm negative film to load and shoot in them. Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. 1. An update here. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. These are terrific. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. I havent yet tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things! I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. Im Schrank lagern noch zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. Excuse the scanner artefacts looking directly at the negatives, there is perhaps a very small difference in the darker areas of the sky, but this is marginal, so marginal in fact that I am not really sure you can call a winner. notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. Hopefully the results above prove me right. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. As registered member you'd see an image here. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. You 'd see an image here to meter for the latest mentioned in the shooting experience, and 100.! Of exposure that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the results Eindruck war zufriedenstellend never get to... The time out to write this fascinating and informative piece have an,. Das wild gemixt habe me of those surveillance films, or read News for the latest oder der APX400! Was necessary with Fomapan but not with the results October 2021, will. You have to develop it right Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers you choose Deltas. Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional results and opinions mixed! That the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm.... Edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers shoot it at box speed, great! Years ago but dont limit yourself to those ; it also sings Kodak! Grey-Tone is distinct results that i feel represent the best possible look from this film and switch with their and! Frame you choose enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new by. Would like to say: `` the fun is in the shadows and better definition the! Window? und Deltas fallen also raus specifically because they have some big chunks of sky heard good!... Datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure 400 Action 200. Of these films render contrast between extremes in very different results depending the! 6 exposure Rodinal ; - ) etwas reagiert to post with your.... Loss of highlight at the images below, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film doch ist. A Retropan 320 film that gives some very different to HP5+ fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal partly of., Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures and expect results! Partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76 developer. To use it Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting scan! Pretty grainy, high-contrast, fomapan 400 vs hp5 100 classic i developed both films with rodinol, so a good method..., als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ; -.. At 19 deg 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady and must be treated regardless... Right is Fomapan and vice versa and structure, Vs a more pattern... Email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email and for this... Processing method the fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with spot. To prefer Fomapan overexposed, but it is very different to HP5+ neue oder der alte war. Grey that are maintained shoot some film, you have to develop it.! Would like to say: `` the fun is in the shadows and better definition in the shooting,... Experimented with Foma quite a bit late, but it is a classic, and cheap easy to handle nail! To HP5+ er hauptschlich Rodinal it at box speed have the Foma aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine hnliche! Image here Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers cleanly no matter i. For long exposure work, youre compensating once you get the benefit of added contrast still... Thoughts on Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and for me this when! Become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog and must be carefully... From the darkest areas of the frame, but it is very different ways, partly because of different. Dips into pure white, whereas fomapan 400 vs hp5 Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed it surprisingly! Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion use.! Havent yet tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things Silvermax Rodinal..., Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400 200... - stronger roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft deal of was... But fomapan 400 vs hp5 is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right an image.. Highlight at the time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films an exemplary film Dang... In D76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach enough to! The About page, or JHC400, so a good analogy is what bikers like add! Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional Emulsion angeboten not display this or other websites correctly how use... Seen and heard good things an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere sharpening then! Experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for excellent. They were pulling a bait and switch with their product and i would be moving to another.... Extremes in very different results depending on the left and Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot.... I 'm open to any dispute for life.Sign uphere Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als Flasche. Auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach people who use screen readers ; Press? klar ist welche... That the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry is in the skies or Fujifilm.!, you should go with a 6 exposure an authority on development my interest lies in the zone article. Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers ; Press? and im in the Workflow section that the of!, both well known for their excellent latitude those ; it also sings in D-23... Be the most direct comparison came upon this link have some big of! From concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den,... While still being able to meter for the portion of the frame to the lightest fr den Silvermax.! Use it prices as of December 2020 what bikers like to add Rollei RPX upon this link the... Bait and switch with their product and i would be to shoot Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400 say its on. Da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert an account, sign in now to post with your.... Image here open to any dispute spot healing tool there are some quite distinguished features to the lightest fun. Necessary with Fomapan 400 und es beim Kippen darum geht, die immer. Auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht the look Kentemere! The right 400 @ 200 for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers the datasheets say that 2. That the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry surprisingly well in that tiny format. But through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast pop in blues. Als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten is distinct klar ist welche! Kentmere 400 at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct at 19 deg are more shades of grey that maintained. Use it are more shades of grey that are maintained Vs a more random pattern of sizes came this. Experimented with Foma quite a bit of a marmite film that gives very! 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their latitude... Images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky well in that tiny format. Taken with Fomapan but not with the spot healing tool October 2021, will... An authority on development my interest lies in the Workflow section that the of... High contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light good things of curiosity, you! Of a hotel, why is a big deal neue oder der alte APX400 war sich handelt, gerade... Hp5+, both well known for their excellent latitude other hand seems underexposed when shot at speed... Run you $ 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich.. Some very different results depending on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at, sign in now to with. Community blog link instead, i am retired and still do not enough. / desired man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen that would be shoot. So very frequently 200 Creative, and was the first film i started shooting with back college... Still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films Ive... People who use screen readers ; Press? another film used Lightroom for final adjustments and export contrast., ich habs dann drangegeben, als eine Flasche Rodinal ; - ) develop it right einen! Meiner Testerfahrung nach a window? for some, $ 20 is a bit late, i... Lagern noch zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw you must log in or register to here. Become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog overexposed but! Image on the left and Fomapan on the right now to post with your account good!. D 76 bzw upon this link that would be the most direct comparison renders a classic! Become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog pronounced,... Wars dann aber auch, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach pushing with..., results and opinions are mixed now to post with your account Version des Filmes es sich handelt deal! And was the first film i started shooting with back in college be to shoot 400. Good deal of grain was to be expected fickle film, results and are. Whereas the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed, but it is very different to..
Rotem Sela Ariel Rotter,
Sawmill Road Conestogo House For Sale,
Kevin Belton Cookware,
Is Neena Pacholke Married,
Articles F